Analisis Kualitatif Terhadap Pandangan Kumaila Tentang Konsumsi Daging Babi dalam Diskursus Islam Perspektif Ulama Tradisional

Ahmad Mahfud; Nurul  Hamidah; Surya Saputra  Mahmud; Moh.  Yardho

doi:10.70742/arlash.v2i1.193

Authors

Ahmad Mahfud Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Nurul Hamidah Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Surya Saputra Mahmud Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Moh. Yardho Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70742/arlash.v2i1.193

Keywords:

pork, scientific arguments\, Islamic law

Abstract

This research discusses issues related to the controversy over the law of consuming pork in Islam, triggered by Kumaila's views in a YouTube video, which has caused debate among the public and necessitates an in-depth analysis to understand Kumaila's arguments. The purpose of this research is to criticize scientific arguments related to the law of consuming pork in Islam and analyze Kumaila's views on pork through the video "The Influence of Environment on Cultural Formation". The research uses a descriptive qualitative approach with the content analysis method, where analysis steps are carried out objectively and systematically to identify specific characteristics of Kumaila's views. The results show that Kumaila argues the reason for the prohibition of pork is not solely due to health issues, but rather because of the geographical conditions in the Middle East that are dry and water-scarce. Kumaila also criticizes the views of scholars who forbid pork for health reasons and argues that the law of consuming pork needs to be considered in the historical, cultural, and religious context of the modern era. The implications of this research are to provide a more comprehensive understanding of Kumaila's arguments regarding the law of consuming pork and open a discussion on the reinterpretation of religious law in the modern context, serving as a reference for the public and scholars to understand this controversial issue from various perspectives.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini membahas permasalahan terkait kontroversi hukum mengonsumsi daging babi dalam Islam, yang dipicu oleh pandangan Kumaila dalam video YouTube. Pandangan ini menimbulkan perdebatan di kalangan masyarakat, sehingga perlu dilakukan analisis mendalam untuk memahami argumentasi Kumaila. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkritisi argumen ilmiah terkait hukum mengonsumsi daging babi dalam Islam dan menganalisis pandangan Kumaila tentang babi melalui video "Pengaruh Lingkungan Terhadap Pembentukan Budaya". Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan metode analisis konten. Langkah-langkah analisis dilakukan secara objektif dan sistematik untuk mengidentifikasi karakteristik khusus dari pandangan Kumaila. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Kumaila berpendapat bahwa alasan diharamkannya daging babi bukan semata-mata karena masalah kesehatan, melainkan karena kondisi geografis di Timur Tengah yang kering dan langka air. Kumaila juga mengkritisi pandangan ulama yang mengharamkan daging babi karena alasan kesehatan dan berargumentasi bahwa hukum mengonsumsi daging babi perlu dipertimbangkan dalam konteks historis, budaya, dan agama di era modern. Implikasi penelitian ini adalah memberikan pemahaman yang lebih komprehensif tentang argumentasi Kumaila terkait hukum mengonsumsi daging babi dan membuka diskusi tentang reinterpretasi hukum agama dalam konteks modern. Penelitian ini juga dapat menjadi referensi bagi masyarakat dan ulama untuk memahami isu kontroversial ini dari berbagai perspektif.

Kata kunci: daging babi; argumen ilmiah; hukum Islam.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alwis. “Kritik Ilmiah dalam Perspektif Islam: Metode Dakwah Masyarakat Ilmiah.” Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh 14, no. 2 (2013): 193–201. https://doi.org/10.24252/jdt.v14i2.327.

BABI HARAM! Kenapa Allah SWT Menciptakan? | Ustadz Abdul Somad, 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jm4U4HO5z38.

Disway.id. “Daging Babi.” disway.id. Diakses 3 Februari 2025. https://disway.id/read/798306/daging-babi.

Echmar, Badai. “(2) Dialog Muallaf dan Murtadin | Kalian pasti kaget dg 1 sosok ini | Facebook.” Diakses 3 Februari 2025. https://web.facebook.com/groups/225157887497430/posts/8200295053316967/?_rdc=1&_rdr#.

Fatoni, Ahmad. Fiqih Ibadah. Malang: UMMPress, 2024.

Gus Baha: Orang Islam Harus Dilatih Logika dan ilmu., 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgKezLVDnSM.

Habibulloh, Muhammad Nabil. “Binatang Ternak Dalam Al-Qur’an (Kajian Tematik).” Diploma, IAIN Ponorogo, 2024. https://etheses.iainponorogo.ac.id/30201/.

Hakim, Azizul. “Kritik Ilmiah Dalam Perspektif Islam.” Jurnal Pendidikan Kreatif 2, no. 1 (31 Agustus 2021): 51–56. https://doi.org/10.24252/jpk.v2i1.23480.

Hakimah, Kumaila. “Mengapa Banyak Orang Agamis Berpikiran Sempit Dan Lucu?” Islami[dot]co, 30 Agustus 2019. https://islami.co/mengapa-banyak-orang-agamis-berpikiran-sempit-dan-lucu/.

Hermanto, Agus. “Konsep Maslahat dalam Menyikapi Masalah Kontemporer (Studi Komparatif al-Tûfi dan al-Ghazali).” Al-’Adalah 14, no. 2 (27 Desember 2017): 433–60. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v14i2.2414.

Hikmatullah. Hadis Ahkam. Serang: Penerbit A-Empat, 2023.

Ishak, Sufriadi. “Logika dan Penalaran Dalam Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Al-Mizan 10, no. 1 (2023): 13–26. https://doi.org/10.54621/jiam.v10i1.581.

Iskan, Dahlan. “Malang-Post.Com - Daging Babi.” Malang-Post.Com (blog), 2 Juli 2024. https://malang-post.com/2024/07/03/daging-babi/.

Keintjem, Ridel, F. S. Oley, G. D. Lensun, dan J. Pandey. “Pengaruh Pendapatan terhadap Konsumsi Daging Babi di Kecamatan Wanea Kelurahan Ranotana Weru.” ZOOTEC 36, no. 1 (2016): 139–46. https://doi.org/10.35792/zot.36.1.2016.10459.

Kumaat, Brigita KM, F. H. Elly, E. Wantasen, dan L. S. Kalangi. “Analisis konsumsi daging babi oleh masyarakat pesisir danau Tondano.” ZOOTEC 39, no. 2 (2019): 249–56. https://doi.org/10.35792/zot.39.2.2019.24868.

Mahyuddin, Mohammad, Mohd Ashrof Zaki, dan Mohd Dasuqkhi. “Element of Swine from the Perspective of Fiqh Ruling and Fatwa in Malaysia,” 2017. http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/resources/files/Pertanika%20PAPERS/JSSH%20Vol.%2025%20(S)%20Dec.%202017/10%20JSSH(S)-0565-2017.pdf.

Makarim, Muhmmad Ghifari, Hikmawati Rahayu, dan Mulia Mardi. “Roland Barthes’ Semiotic Analysis Of The Meaning Of Haram In The Quran.” QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies 2, no. 3 (27 September 2023): 331–46. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v2i3.2574.

Masrukhin. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Media Ilmu Press, 2014.

Meiri, Meirav, Dorothée Huchon, Guy Bar-Oz, Elisabetta Boaretto, Liora Kolska Horwitz, Aren M. Maeir, Lidar Sapir-Hen, Greger Larson, Steve Weiner, dan Israel Finkelstein. “Ancient DNA and Population Turnover in Southern Levantine Pigs- Signature of the Sea Peoples Migration?” Scientific Reports 3, no. 1 (4 November 2013): 3035. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03035.

Mokoginta, Insan L. S. Dialog rasional Islam-Kristen. Yayasan Ukhuwah Islamiyah, 1995.

“Moshe ben Maimon.” Dalam Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia, ensiklopedia bebas, 25 Oktober 2024. https://id.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moshe_ben_Maimon&oldid=26455042.

Nasaiburi, Muslim bin al-?ujj?j. al-Musnad al-?a??? al-Mu?ta?ar bin-naqli al-?Adl ?an ?Adl il? Ras?lill?hi ?allall?hu ?Alaihi wa-Sallam. Beirut: D?r I?y?? at-Tur?? al-?Arab?, t.t.

Nur Faizah. “Konsep Wali Nikah Dalam Perspektif Ulama Klasik Dan Modern.” Al-Muqaranah?: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum 2, no. 2 (26 Agustus 2024): 57–64. https://doi.org/10.55210/jpmh.v2i2.446.

Pengaruh Lingkungan Terhadap Pembentukan Budaya - Forbidden Questions, 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wj8ER8ScR6A.

Pettigrew, J. E., dan M. A. Esnaola. “Swine nutrition and pork quality: A review1.” Journal of Animal Science 79, no. suppl_E (1 Januari 2001): E316–42. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas2001.79E-SupplE316x.

Qamar, Muhammad Fiaz dan Ifrah Raza. “Scientific evidences that pig meat (pork) is prohibited for human health.,” 2012. https://www.animalsciencejournal.usamv.ro/pdf/vol55/a56.pdf.

Redding, Richard E. “The Pig and the Chicken in the Middle East: Modeling Human Subsistence Behavior in the Archaeological Record Using Historical and Animal Husbandry Data.” ResearchGate 24, no. 4 (22 Oktober 2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-015-9083-2.

“Religious restrictions on the consumption of pork.” Dalam Wikipedia, 25 Januari 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Religious_restrictions_on_the_consumption_of_pork&oldid=1271835139.

Ridho, Muhammad, Ayu Anggraini, dan Yoli Oktaviani. “Halal And Haram Food In Islam: Science Perspective.” El-Faqih: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 2 (2021): 124–42.

Saber, Roaa. “Why Can’t Muslims Eat Pork? Unveiling the Divine Wisdom Behind Dietary Restrictions.” Learn Quran online, Arabic & Islamic Studies Online | IQRA Network, 24 Februari 2024. https://iqranetwork.com/blog/why-cant-muslims-eat-pork-unveiling-the-divine-wisdom-behind-dietary-restrictions/.

Salsabilla, Adelia Zahra, dan Tasya Afril Maulida. “Pembagian Najis Dalam Agama Islam.” Religion?: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, Dan Budaya 2, no. 6 (21 November 2023): 518–25. https://doi.org/10.55606/religion.v1i6.761.

Sasson, Aharon. Peternakan Hewan Di Israel Kuno Perspektif Zooarchaeological Tentang Eksploitasi Ternak, Manajemen Ternak Dan Strategi Ekonomi. Approaches to Anthropological Archaeology. London?; Oakville, CT: Equinox, 2010. 10.4324/9781315541259.

Schorsch, Ismar. “The Story of Pig As Taboo - Jewish Theological Seminary.” Diakses 31 Januari 2025. https://www.jtsa.edu/torah/the-story-of-pig-as-taboo/.

Sheikhi, Mohammad Ali, dan Mehdi Dehghani Firoozabadi. “Pork Meat From The Viewpoints Of Quran And Medical Research.” World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 4, no. 08 (t.t.). https://wjpr.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/article_issue/1438318922.pdf.

Shihab, Muhammad Quraish. Tafsir Al Misbah (Kesan, pesan, dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an). Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2006.

Swastika, Esha Aisia, Sevi Rahma Heraziza, Zidan Rizka Alhafidz, Farida Melladewi, Nikita Widhi Astuti, dan Nur Rofi. “Studi Halal and Haram Foods terhadap Kesehatan dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam berbasis Case Method.” Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia 2, no. 3 (2023): 466–76. https://doi.org/10.58344/jmi.v2i3.185.

“Taeniasis, Cysticercosis and Coenurosis,” 2020. https://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/Factsheets/pdfs/taenia.pdf.

Temper, Leah. “Creating Facts on the Ground: Agriculture in Israel and Palestine (1882-2000).” Historia Agraria, 2009. https://www.historiaagraria.com/FILE/articulos/48leah.pdf.