Legal Politics and Legal Development in Indonesia: Institutional Independence, Substantive Justice, and Socio-Legal Realities

Namukose Lilian; Absori Absori; Yona Walya

doi:10.70742/hrj.v2i1.1016

Authors

Namukose Lilian Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Absori Absori Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Yona Walya Kampala International University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70742/hrj.v2i1.1016

Keywords:

Legal Politics, Legal Development, Institutional Independence, Substantive Justice, Socio-Legal Realities

Abstract

Legal development in Indonesia is constituted by the interplay of political power, institutional structures, and socio-legal conditions, and other socio-legal factors, but these three dimensions are conventionally disconnected in the analysis, where there are limited efforts to address the relationship between these factors in explaining the substance and operational capacity of law. This study probes the political influence on legal development and how institutional and socio-legal factors influence the realization of substantive justice and law's legitimacy. This study employs normative-juridical research combined with socio-legal methodology, supported by conceptual and comparative research. Primary legal materials of constitutional mandates, legislation, regulations and case law are examined in conjunction with secondary legal and scholarly materials via interpretive, thematic and comparative analysis. While Indonesia and Uganda are the major comparative references, discussion of selected features of the United Kingdom, India and South Africa are included. The result demonstrates that political influences influence law through legal and institutional process and formal independence, accountability, capacity and integrity of the legal institutions to effectively implement legal principles. In addition, that formal legal acknowledgment does not necessarily generate substantive justice where institutional deficiencies, social injustice, judicial-linguistic-cultural disparities and implementation gaps are present, and that technological change and transnational legal influence also create additional challenges on the political influence and capacity of law. The main contribution is to establish an integrated model of legal development, conceptualizing legal development as a non-linear process in which political power, institutional capacity and independence, and social factors interact to shape the substantive and operational capacity of law. Such legal development is contingent on the political-institutional-socio-legal contexts on which accountability, institutional integrity, and social and cultural conditions in achieving justice, and the public's welfare.

References

Abebe, A. K. (2024). The (Il)legitimacy of Constitutional Amendments in Africa and Democratic Backsliding. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 19(3), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2024.16

Al Izzati, R., Dartanto, T., Suryadarma, D., & Suryahadi, A. (2024). Direct elections and trust in state and political institutions: Evidence from Indonesia’s election reform. European Journal of Political Economy, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102572

Aris Hardinanto, Barda Nawawi Arief, Joko Setiyono, Zico Junius Fernando, & Nahdiya Sabrina. (2024). Critical Analysis of Living Law Formulation in Law No.1 of 2023 Concerning the Criminal Code: Towards Law Reform to Realize Justice with the Spirit of Pancasila. Journal of Law & Legal Reform, (3). https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i3.13923

Arizona, Y. (2024). Legal Policy of President Joko Widodo and the Independence of Constitutional Court. Jurnal Konstitusi, 21(1), 35–61. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2113

Aytac, U. (2024). Big Tech, Algorithmic Power, and Democratic Control. Journal of Politics, 86(4), 1431–1445. https://doi.org/10.1086/729938

Block-Lieb, S. (2022). Global Scripts in Transnational Legal Orders and Governance. Downloaded from Www.Annualreviews.Org. Guest (Guest. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-111621

Butt, S., & Murharjanti, P. (2022). What constitutes compliance? Legislative responses to Constitutional Court decisions in Indonesia. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 20(1), 428–453. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac014

Callais, J. T., & Mkrtchian, G. (2024). Court-Packing and Judicial Manipulation. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4651262

Chandranegara, I. S., & Cahyawati, D. P. (2023). Conflict of interest prevention clause in the constitution: The study of the Indonesian Constitution. Heliyon, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14679

Chemin, M. (2021). Can judiciaries constrain executive power? Evidence from judicial reforms. Journal of Public Economics, 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104428

Constitution of Kenya. (2010). THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA, 2010. www.kenyalaw.org

Constitutional Court Ethics Council. (2023). Putusan Majelis Kehormantan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 02/MKMK/L/11/2023.

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2023). Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023.

Contini, F., Ontanu, E. A., & Velicogna, M. (2024). AI Accountability in Judicial Proceedings: An Actor–Network Approach. Laws, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13060071

Cotterell, R. (2023). A socio?legal quest: from jurisprudence to sociology of law and back again. Journal of Law and Society, 50(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12403

Darr, A. (2025). The legitimacy gap in borrowed laws: a case study of competition law transplants in South Asia. Legal Studies, 45(4), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2025.10093

Dent, C. (2024). Governmentality and the Common Law: Expansion of “Mind” 1835–1885. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 39(5), 1409–1436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-024-10217-0

Desai, D. (2023). Law and the political stakes of global crises: Lessons from development practice for a coronavirus world. Law and Policy, 45(3), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12203

Dressel, B., & Bonoan, C. R. (2024). Courts and authoritarian populism in Asia: Reflections from Indonesia and the Philippines. Law and Policy, 46(3), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12240

Fernando, Z. J., Pujiyono, P., Susetyo, H., Candra, S., & Putra, P. S. (2022). Preventing bribery in the private sector through legal reform based on Pancasila. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2138906

Fernando, & Zico Junius. (2022). Legal Politics Formation of Leglislation in the Indonesia National Legal System. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 10(2), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.7.2.182-191

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge; Selected interviews and other Writings 1972-1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). Pantheon Books.

Gritsenko, D., & Wood, M. (2022). Algorithmic governance: A modes of governance approach. Regulation and Governance, 16(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12367

Halliday, T. C. (2023). Global legal change from below and above. Journal of Law and Society, 50(3), 295–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12444

Huchhanavar, S. S. (2023). Conceptualising Judicial Independence and Accountability from a Regulatory Perspective. Oslo Law Review, 9(2), 110–148. https://doi.org/10.18261/olr.9.2.3

Irianto, S. (2024). Inheritance legal pluralism and gender justice: a court room study in Indonesia. Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis, 56(3), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/27706869.2024.2379738

Lambais, G., & Sigstad, H. (2023). Judicial subversion: The effects of political power on court outcomes. Journal of Public Economics, 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104788

M Akbar Hadiprabowo, Wasino Wasino, & Edi Kurniawan. (2024). Pancasila in Modern Indonesian Legal Reform: Addressing Current Cases and International Debates on Ideology and Law. Journal of Law & Legal Reform, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i4.18922

Macdonald, A., Cooper-Knock, S. J., & Hopwood, J. (2022). “Maybe we should take the legal ways”: Citizen engagement with lower state courts in post-war northern Uganda. Law and Society Review, 56(4), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12630

Miaz, J., Niederhauser, M., & Maggetti, M. (2024). From international law to subnational practices: How intermediaries translate the Istanbul Convention. Regulation and Governance, 18(1), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12523

Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating Capabilities. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2023). United Nations Human Rights Appeal 2023.

PALGUNA, I. D. G., & WARDANA, A. (2024). Pragmatic Monism: The Practice of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in Engaging with International Law. Asian Journal of International Law, 14(2), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251323000723

Pambudi, B. R., Antikowati, & Yunita, dan F. T. (2025). Abuse of Authority by the House of Representatives in the Replacement of Constitutional Court Judges: A Threat to Judicial Independence. Jurnal Konstitusi, 22(1), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2215

Parliament of Uganda. (2017). Conststutional (Amendment) Act,.

Putu, N., Yuliartini, R., Bagus, I., Putra, W., Marhendra, G., Atmaja, W., Gede, D., Mangku, S., (2022). THE CONSTRUCTION OF NATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEMS FROM PANCASILA’S PERSPECTIVE PEMBANGUNAN SISTEM HUKUM NASIONAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF PANCASILA. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 7(2), 479–488. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jppk

Radley Henrico. (2023). JUDICIAL REVIEW IN SOUTH AFRICA AND INDIA: ADVANCING CONSTITUTIONALISM OR UNDUE ACTIVISM? Obiter, 43(4). https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v43i4.15412

Raila Amolo Odinga and others V Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission and another. (2017).

Riwanto, A. (2022). CONSTRUCTION OF LEGAL CULTURE MODEL FOR CORRUPTION PREVENTION THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA IN INDONESIA. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 11(3), 385. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.11.3.2022.385-404

Rodiyah, R. (2023). Mainstreaming Justice in the Establishment of Laws and Regulations Process: Comparing Case in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Australia. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.60096

Scheppele, K. L. (2024). The Life of The Rule of Law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 2024, 12, 33. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-010924

Sen, A. K. (2009). The Idea of Justice. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674054578

United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights Preamble. www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

United Nations. (1985). Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary.

United Nations. (2015). 70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Preamble.

Velásquez Ochoa, J. A., Betancourt Durango, R. A., Garcés Giraldo, L. F., Castilla Cabezudo, J. L., Garcia Arango, D. A., Giraldo, M. G., & Jaramillo Gómez, N. I. (2026). Legal Transplants: Truths and Errors in Comparative Legal Analysis. In Laws (Vol. 15, Number 4). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/laws15040067

Wijatmoko, E., Armawi, A., & Fathani, T. F. (2023). Legal effectiveness in promoting development policies: A case study of North Aceh Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21280

Wiratraman, H. P. (2022). Constitutional Struggles and the Court in Indonesia’s Turn to Authoritarian Politics. Federal Law Review, 50(3), 314–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0067205X221107404

Xenidis, R. (2024). Beyond bias: algorithmic machines, discrimination law and the analogy trap. Transnational Legal Theory, 14(4), 378–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2024.2307200

Yustia, D. A., & Arifin, F. (2023). Bureaucratic reform as an effort to prevent corruption in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2166196

Zoppolato, D. G., & Farah, P. D. (2025). China’s Path to Modernization and Legal Pluralism: Transplants and the Belt and Road Initiative. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 12(2), 109–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2025.7

Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y. C., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577